October 2003 Articles
 
Thinking Big:
Partnerships Add Their Insight to Sears Redevelopment Effort
 
Members Apply Five-Year Goals to Lake Street Redevelopment Effort
Scale and Ambition:
The Rise, Fall and Rise of Sears Centers Nationwide
Events Showcase
Midtown Greenway
Small Business, Big Picture
Lake Street Council Joins MCW Partnership
Partner Profile
Lake Street Council
Con Mucho Gusto:
Reaching Out to South Minneapolis' Latino Community
Midtown Community Works Newsletters
 

Comments on Sears Development Proposal

Scale and Ambition: Historical and National Perspecitve on the Sears Redevelopment

Framework of Values and Comments

Resolution Offering Comments to the City of Minneapolis on the Sears Redevelopment Proposals

WHEREAS, the public and private members of the Midtown Community Works Partnership and the Phillips Partnership (hereinafter “Partnerships”) have collectively invested nearly $500 million in the Phillips neighborhood and Midtown Corridor, including the construction of a new heart hospital at Abbott Northwestern, the acquisition of the Honeywell headquarters for a new Wells Fargo Mortgage campus, housing improvements, job training, crime prevention, construction of the Midtown Greenway, and the reconstruction of Lake Street; when combined with additional investments in Light Rail Transit and other transportation improvements, over $1 billion is envisioned in public and private investment for the Phillips neighborhood and Midtown Corridor by the year 2008;

WHEREAS, the Sears building is the largest building in the City of Minneapolis, reflects a magnificent Art Deco historic design, and has stood vacant since 1994; and the members of the Partnerships envision the successful redevelopment of the Sears site as a powerful catalyst to revitalize the Midtown Greenway – Lake Street Corridor and the Phillips neighborhood;

WHEREAS, the Partnerships seek to lend their collective planning and investment experience to the Sears redevelopment proposal selection process in order to provide review and comment on the proposals to the City of Minneapolis;

WHEREAS, the Partnerships have devoted considerable resources to research, hearing presentations from the redevelopment proposers, and study of their specific proposals, including a staff study work session on September 3, and a joint Partnerships meeting on September 11;

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Midtown Community Works Partnership and the Phillips Partnership that the following comments are offered to the City of Minneapolis for consideration in the selection of a developer for the Sears site:

Finance and Economic Development

1. Further financial scrutiny: Given the large scale of this project and the lack of success with previous attempts to redevelop the Sears site, selecting a financially sound proposal is paramount. The Partnerships urge that the City intensely scrutinize the financial experience and expertise of each team and its capacity to complete a project with the financial needs of the complexity and scale of the Sears redevelopment project; it is important that the selected developer demonstrate sufficient net worth, past experience in large scale development projects, and assembled expertise to indicate that the development and operating pro formas are feasible and realistic. It should be expected that the selected developer will be required to provide significant financial guarantees for at least a portion of the development sources of revenue. Accordingly, the net worth of the developer, past experience in development projects of a similar scale ($100 million), and a careful and thorough assessment of the financial and other risks in the project, are important considerations. Housing represents approximately 30 – 40% of the total project budget for three of the developer proposals (Comote, Fine, and Ryan). The use of Low Income Housing Tax Credits, Historic Tax Credits and other established sources of housing development revenue would indicate that this component of the project poses relatively low financial risk to the developers. The critical financial questions concerning the housing component concern the nature of the rental housing market, and the particular sectors of that market (seniors, work force, artist live-work space) targeted in the respective proposals. The hotel component of these three developer proposals is the component presenting the greatest financial risk, and operating challenges, and hence require the most significant equity commitment and operating expertise. Comote’s proposal would sell a hotel pad section of the site and provide for independent development of the hotel. The Ryan and Fine proposals envision partnership with the Sheraton and Radisson Hotel groups respectively. Ryan has interests in two hotel projects: a 100% ownership in a Radisson in Moline, Illinois and a 50% interest in a Radisson project in San Antonio, Texas.;

2. Jobs: Three of the four proposers have estimated that their projects would create between 1500 and 2500 jobs (Fine, 1500-2000 jobs; Ryan, 1780 jobs; Comote, 2500 jobs). The Partnerships urge that the City pursue a development agreement that envisions access of neighborhood residents to these jobs through such initiatives as “100 Hard Hats” or other similar programs designed to provide access to living wage, construction jobs for community residents and persons of color; that they include a mix of commercial retail opportunities in an international ethnic market, including opportunities for “start-up,” “step-up,” and established businesses; and that medical office opportunities for skilled workers be pursued in tandem with established training initiatives;

3. Leverage: The Partnerships urge the City to assure that investments in existing businesses at Lake and Chicago (e.g. northeast corner) be preserved, and that the selected developer fully integrate the planning and design of their project into the planned reconstruction of Lake Street, and proposed transportation improvements such as the I-35W Access Project;

Meeting Community Needs

4. Safety: The Partnerships find that most of the proposals envision significant street-level retail and pedestrian activity, and that the successful redevelopment of the Sears site generally can be a catalyst for significant neighborhood crime reduction. Specific design elements of structures over the Greenway, such as an atrium or glass walls, provide safety benefits through additional “eyes” on the Greenway. Nevertheless, the Partnerships request that the City continue to highlight the importance of Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles, and pursue a more explicit crime prevention plan as part of the project, so that the security plans for the Sears complex are fully integrated with existing crime prevention and enforcement initiatives in the Chicago-Lake area;

5. Housing: The Partnerships find that three of the four proposals (Fine, Ryan, and Comote) clearly demonstrate a meaningful commitment to including affordable housing in their development, but that much greater clarification is in order to ascertain how the particular housing mix proposed meets market demand for housing at this site in this neighborhood. Further, the City should seek assurance that an appropriate, diverse mix of housing opportunities are created that match the array of financial tools and resources available for this project.
Sustainable Design

6. Lake Street Orientation: The Partnerships urge that the redevelopment of the Sears site be designed so as to highlight the Lake Street “front door” of the development, highlighting Lake Street as a prime regional destination of vibrant commercial activity, and supporting the growth of all of the businesses along Lake Street.

7. Lake Street – Greenway Connection: The Partnerships find that it is essential for the developers to integrate successfully the street-level commercial activity on both east and west sides of the Sears building, pedestrian and bicycle access between Lake Street and the Greenway, and transit accommodations for both the Metro Transit Hub and a future streetcar station. The Partnerships urge that further design elements such as sight lines, landscaping, and public art draw attention to the connections between Lake Street and the Greenway.

8. Greenway Orientation: The Partnerships urge that the redevelopment of the Sears site create a premier interface with the Midtown Greenway, by including design elements such as publicly accessible open space adjacent to the Greenway’s cycling and walking trails, strong sight lines looking into the Greenway and an atrium in the 1964 building, landscaping and public art in and visible from the Greenway, minimal use of north-facing retaining walls in the area south of the Greenway trails between Chicago Avenue and the train shed, and minimal surface parking adjacent to the Greenway.

9. Transit Orientation: The Partnerships find that the Chicago-Lake intersection will grow intensely as a major transit hub, and that this hub must be fully integrated into and supported by the Sears site design. The Metro Transit Hub works best for transit operations and for neighborhood pedestrians and bicyclists if sited closer to Lake Street than to the Greenway. Further, the Partnerships urge that the future development of the Midtown Greenway streetcar be incorporated into the project so as to provide for a future streetcar station in the vicinity of the existing train shed.

10. Public Art: The Partnerships urge that the Sears site design include a public art program that includes planned interface with the new Chicago Avenue bridge over the Greenway; permanent and temporary Greenway public art exhibition opportunities, and interior space in the Sears complex for community-based art exhibits or performances.

APPROVED: September 11, 2003